McCaskill: Iraq withdrawal timetable "not set in stone"

Missouri Senator Claire McKaskill, whom we elected among other things to end the abominable war in Iraq, told MSNBC Tuesday that Barack Obama still wants to withdraw from Iraq, and that although he still believes troops can be withdrawn according to his primary season pledge of 1 or 2 brigades per months, we should beware of supposing that such pledge is "set in stone".

It is all "based on the circumstances".
A summary of McCaskill's statements can be seen here.

I am tempted to feel upset about this lack of commitment by Obama, if this top supporter is telling the truth. But at the same time I am told we have to be pragmatic and move to the center.

What do you guys think?



Display:


Re: McCaskill: Iraq withdrawal (none / 0)

I think Obama should not deal with Iraq according to silly things like the "circumstances" or the facts on the ground.  I say remove all the troops the day of the inauguration, effects on global oil prices or the stability of the country be damned!


by OMG LOLZZ on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 03:55:02 PM EST

Re: McCaskill: Iraq withdrawal (none / 0)

He committed to remove all US troops in one year!!!! I saw him say it several times.


by ottovbvs on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 04:00:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCaskill: Iraq withdrawal (2.00 / 1)

OMG!! Exactly!! He's just a big flip-flopper.  I don't want a president who takes account of the facts on the ground, no matter how the circumstances might differ between now and then!!  When Obama says years before he is elected that troops should come home within a year of the election, he better stick to it!


by OMG LOLZZ on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 04:03:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCaskill: Iraq withdrawal (none / 0)

16 months to be exact.


Faced with the choice between changing one's mind and proving that there is no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof.
by jsfox on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 04:11:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCaskill: Iraq withdrawal (2.00 / 1)

People say a lot of things in the primary to win the nomination. Why do you think we should hold him up to some new standard?

Look at the big picture a democrat in the office.


He was warmly received by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who called him "a leader that God has blessed us with at this time."
by roxfoxy on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 05:31:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCaskill: Iraq withdrawal (none / 0)

The rationalisations by the Obamanauts over what were make or break issues a few weeks ago is wondrous to behold. I don't blame him for making adjustments but if Clinton had suggested this you folks would have been all over her. That said I believe most core democrats want this war ending and if he's going to start wobbling on that we might as well vote for McCain and that's how a lot of people are going to see it. Based on his poll numbers which are very weak given the electoral landscape he can't afford too many flubs like this.  


by ottovbvs on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 09:22:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCaskill: Iraq withdrawal (none / 0)

He holds himself to a higher standard.  He can't run against Washington politics and then become a typical Washington politician.


Another Clintonista against John McCain
by psychodrew on Fri Jul 04, 2008 at 01:19:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCaskill: Iraq withdrawal (none / 0)

Um...the plan was always for a phased withdrawal of the majority of US troops over 16 months, with some adjustments based on the recommendations of the military brass.

Do you have a link to him saying "1 year"?  Because I'd never heard that to be his position.  


John McCain: Healthcare for Kids? In America? No way
by bosdcla14 on Fri Jul 04, 2008 at 04:20:54 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCaskill: Iraq withdrawal (2.00 / 1)

So he would deal with Iraq according to conditions on the ground ?

- thats the right position by the way . ( lets leave aside the fact that he wasn't saying that during the primaries )

However how is that different from Mccain's position ?  or George Bush's for that matter.


Educated in a small town Taught to fear Jesus in a small town Used to daydream in that small town Another born romantic that's me.
by lori on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 04:16:10 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCaskill: Iraq withdrawal (none / 0)

OMG! Thats the WRONG position, and its no different from George Bush or John McCain.  I've been saying all along that Barry O = McCain and his 100 years of war.


by OMG LOLZZ on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 04:20:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCaskill: Iraq withdrawal timetable (none / 0)

Well he's already switched on FISA, NAFTA and religious outreach programs, is Iraq next.


by ottovbvs on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 03:59:25 PM EST

Re: McCaskill: Iraq withdrawal timetable (none / 0)

Obama hasn't shifted on NAFTA or religious outreach.


by Homebrewer on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 04:09:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCaskill: Iraq withdrawal timetable (none / 0)

1 for 3.

Shifted on FISA (actually, "shifted" is being generous---completely changed his position on FISA.  

But consistent on NAFTA and religious outreach programs.  


John McCain: Healthcare for Kids? In America? No way
by bosdcla14 on Fri Jul 04, 2008 at 04:30:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Obama "refines" his position yet again (2.00 / 1)

It's frontpage on the New York Times.

http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/ 07/03/obama-open-to-refine-iraq-withdraw al-timeline/index.html?hp

He says it'll be based on his meetings with commanders on the ground.

My question:  why is he only visiting the commanders in the ground right now??  I know he's been there once before, a few years ago, but as someone who has used Iraq to every advantage in the primary election, shouldn't he have talked more to the commanders on the ground about how best to nuance his (shifting) positions?


by Sieglinde on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 04:06:20 PM EST

Re: Obama "refines" his (2.00 / 1)

OMGG!!! Your so right.  Its almost as if he is deliberately softening his rhetoric to appease moderate swing voters he will need to win the election.  I don't want a candidate who cares about winning.  I want a candidate who appeals only to the base and is willing to loose in order to uphold principles!!  Obama doesn't realize that its PRINCIPLES that matter, even if you don't have any power to put those principles into action! OMG How can he be this stupid!! LOLZZZZZ!!!!!  !


by OMG LOLZZ on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 04:10:29 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama "refines" his (none / 0)

Any number of OMGs and LOLZZs does not obscure the fact that despite your attempt at parody, you reveal one truth:  that Obama cares only about winning.


by Sieglinde on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 04:14:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama "refines" his (none / 0)

Your right!  And winning sucks unless you can do it by remaining ideologically pure.


by OMG LOLZZ on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 04:16:52 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama "refines" his (none / 0)

Ideological purity is not the question LOL OMG.  It's the promise to bring the troops back home soon LOL OMG.  If this is your case LOL OMG, then you ought to just stick to typing "LOL OMG" for the rest of this thread LOL OMG.


by Sieglinde on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 04:20:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama "refines" his (none / 0)

You're right a cause now we Obama promising 100 years of war and that he's not going to bring the troops home soon!!


by OMG LOLZZ on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 04:24:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama "refines" his (none / 0)

Yeah OMG I'm guessing that's the only other option.  You're right LOLZZ.


by Sieglinde on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 04:37:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Who said he was bringing the troops home? (none / 0)

more likely they're going to afghanistan.


His head is bowed. He thinks of men and kings. Yea, when the sick world cries, how can he sleep?
by RisingTide on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 04:40:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama "refines" his position (none / 0)

He has advisers on his campaign that have military experience and connections. His advice up until now has more than likely come from their reports. There are also facts and statistics that he isn't privy to and won't be until he takes office.

Events have also changed over the months that have elapsed since the primary started. Iraq has improved and Afghanistan has gotten worse. I sure as hell hope he takes into account all facets of the situation. Don't you?


"The true measure of a man is how he treats someone who can do him absolutely no good." Samuel Johnson
by MS01 Indie on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 04:13:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama "refines" his position (none / 0)

Yes, he ought to take into account all facets of the situation-- but on this issue, he seems to be quite certain:  that troops should be out soon.  Period.

What if the commanders on the ground say that we need 10 more years to fully stabilize the country?  What will Obama's response be?

He won the primary on the strength of his Iraq stance, versus Clinton's more cautious and wishy-washy position.  In fact, this is the only argument that I thought Obama won against Clinton.  And now he's shifting on this as well??

Tough week to be a progressive.


by Sieglinde on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 04:18:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama "refines" his position (none / 0)

What if the commanders on the ground say that we need 10 more years to fully stabilize the country?  What will Obama's response be?
He's already answered this one. He will seek their advice on strategy, but final decisions about the overall course this country takes will be in the hands of the President.

The complaints about this are as baseless as the complaints about gun control, death penalty, nafta, etc... His most recent statements are all in line with his earlier statements. Any differences are minor. Most of the people hollering about him having changed his stance on these issues are people that weren't paying any attention to what he has been saying all along. That includes most Hillary supporters who were more interested in what she had to say than what Obama had to say. That's fine. It's the way things usually go.

What gets me is that now that they are starting to listen to him they think these are changes in policy, because they had painted him as a far-left radical in their own minds. When that proves to be false they have a hard time admitting they were wrong. The only way to do that is to claim he has changed.


"The true measure of a man is how he treats someone who can do him absolutely no good." Samuel Johnson
by MS01 Indie on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 04:26:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama "refines" his position (2.00 / 1)

Oh right, blame the Hillary supporters once again.

How are they "minor differences" when Arianna and Kos and other big blogs are noticing the not-so-subtle shifts in position?

And you're right on one thing-- that Americans by and large don't really know much about where Obama really stands on the issues.  He's at once a moderate to the moderates and progressive to the progressives.  He's everything everyone wants him to be.


by Sieglinde on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 04:42:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

You mean like this? (none / 0)

Yeah, he sure learned a lot on that trip...


by username on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 04:37:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: You mean like this? (2.00 / 1)

Obama disagrees with you.

He's going to Iraq to learn.

His words.

Check it.


by Sieglinde on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 04:43:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: You mean like this? (none / 0)

No, he's going to Iraq because certain clueless tools think combat junkets are informative and useful.  Everyone's expected to do them, but they're a complete joke.


by username on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 04:47:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: You mean like this? (none / 0)

Oh poor Obama, a tool of tools.

A complete joke?  Wow you must be an academic.


by Sieglinde on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 04:55:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: You mean like this? (none / 0)

I have no idea why you conclude that I must be an academic.  I can't think of anything McCain learned walking around that market that he couldn't have learned by having a teleconference or, I dunno, reading a newspaper.

"Tool of tools?"  That describes pretty much any modern American politician.  Sure, just like Sure, they're set for life with book deals and lobbying posts, but politicians put up with a lot of dumb, humiliating crap to get elected: begging for contributions, eating fried thing-on-a-stick, holding random people's babies, answering the same tiring questions again and again from people too lazy to go to a website, pretending to be "outraged" or "contrite" over various media-concocted pseudo-scandals, and on, and on...


by username on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 05:03:13 PM EST
[ Parent ]

*edit* (none / 0)

Ugh, remove "Sure, just like"


by username on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 05:04:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: You mean like this? (2.00 / 1)

A visceral experience-- to actually experience walking through market streets having to wear bullet-proof vests.  Yes, you'll be able to know about the security situation reading the New York Times in your Senate office, but you'll have a different appreciation of the current dangers and emotions when you have to deal with putting bullet-proof vests just to meet ordinary Iraqis.

What's the friggin' harm of going to Iraq anyway??


by Sieglinde on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 06:56:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: You mean like this? (none / 0)

Apart from the posturing itself being kind of vile, it's just a huge waste of resources -- a plane, a platoon of soldiers, hours of generals' time.  I guess visceral experience has some value, but I don't think McCain needs more of that.  He knows that war is nasty business, but he's not in a position to go and fight.  What he can do is look at the larger strategic picture and decide what is in America's interests, and I don't think first-hand experience and photo-ops will help him here.

Maybe that's the semi-academic in me talking (you were right, but I'm not sure what clued you in):  Drawing conclusions from anecdotes is the wrong way to do science and, I think, to run a war.  You need to look at the larger picture, build the models, and run the statistics.


by username on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 08:49:36 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: You mean like this? (2.00 / 1)

Oooh, models and stats-- my kind of scientist.

Honestly, I agree with you about all the silliness of posturing, and of the entire song and dance that attends politics, BUT sometimes there're things you pick up just by being there.

Obama needs to go to Iraq and see what the f* is going on out there.


by Sieglinde on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 09:43:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama "refines" his position (none / 0)

He's always said that the commanders would have input into the redeployment process and that he'd make changes based on their recommendations.  He's emphasizing that more now, but its always been part of the plan.

I also don't think its appropriate to use the military to figure out how to sell stuff politically, so I completely disagree that he should have spoken to the commanders to get their help with that.  


John McCain: Healthcare for Kids? In America? No way
by bosdcla14 on Fri Jul 04, 2008 at 04:34:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCaskill: Iraq withdrawal ti (2.00 / 2)

He is not standing on principle on Iraq ( neither was Hillary Clinton ) . I have been saying it all the while now that his Iraq war rhetoric is outdated and does not conform with the reality on the ground.

I believe the day he makes the trip to Iraq is the day the pendulum on the war swings in favor of Mccain .

There is a New York Times story on its front page now , Obama is already waffling ( parsing ) on Iraq.

http://www.nytimes.com/

I would wait and see what he does and says after the trip to Iraq .

I give Mccain the credit he deserves for standing on  principle even at the expense of his political career . If obama comes back and changes or naunces his position ,the trajectory of the election could change.

I am glad he is switching on a number of issues because it nonetheless brings him to positions similar to mine on Iraq , Talking to dictators , guns , etc.

However it has only made it a tougher vote for me to cast because of his switching positions on this issue because it shows a flaw in judgement .

I anticipate I would be making a final decision in the voting booth.

If he is going to flip to Mccain's position on a lot of these consequential issues , I don't know how persuausive his argument about judgement would be .

However lets wait and see what he does on Iraq , at the very least I am glad there is a recognition of the incredible work the boys and gals over there are doing.  


Educated in a small town Taught to fear Jesus in a small town Used to daydream in that small town Another born romantic that's me.
by lori on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 04:13:16 PM EST

Re: McCaskill: Iraq withdrawal ti (none / 0)

McCain has not stood on principle when it comes to Iraq. I know you are in the habit of defending McCain, but this is just so wrong. McCain was against Iraq before he was for it. He was against Bush policies before he was for them. The only place he has been consistent is on having more troops in Iraq. McCain is a disaster waiting to happen when it comes to foreign affairs.


"The true measure of a man is how he treats someone who can do him absolutely no good." Samuel Johnson
by MS01 Indie on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 04:16:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCaskill: Iraq withdrawal ti (none / 0)

" McCain has not stood on principle when it comes to Iraq. I know you are in the habit of defending McCain, but this is just so wrong. McCain was against Iraq before he was for it. "

- Thats not really credible.

It is hard to know where Obama stands on a lot of these foreign policy /national security issues , that is what is making me really skeptical about voting for me.  


Educated in a small town Taught to fear Jesus in a small town Used to daydream in that small town Another born romantic that's me.
by lori on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 04:23:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCaskill: Iraq withdrawal ti (none / 0)

It's been obvious for quite awhile that McCain is your favorite Republican. Watch this and then tell me you still feel that way.


"The true measure of a man is how he treats someone who can do him absolutely no good." Samuel Johnson
by MS01 Indie on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 04:32:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCaskill: Iraq withdrawal ti (none / 0)

And another one.


"The true measure of a man is how he treats someone who can do him absolutely no good." Samuel Johnson
by MS01 Indie on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 04:36:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCaskill: Iraq withdrawal ti (2.00 / 1)

Dude, you're being pretty rude to lori.  She has her opinion and you frankly aren't doing much help for Obama when you badger her.  She's a conservative dem and it is fairly reasonable that some of them would be attracted to McCain, unless he really hits the wingnut juice which he may very well end up doing.

I'm wondering what role Afghanistan will play into Obama's calculus as to his withdrawal plans with respect to Iraq.  I haven't heard McCain say much about Afghanistan but our troubles in that country may be Obama's escape valve.  I hate foreign policy issues anyway, we always get our asses handed to us on these matters.  Talk about the economy and healthcare, Barack.


by Blazers Edge on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 04:41:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCaskill: Iraq withdrawal ti (none / 0)

I'm not attacking lori. I'm pointing out that she is in the habit of coming to McCain's defense. Shall we all start posting positive diaries about McCain because lori likes him?

lori seems to think McCain2008 is the same as McCain2000. He isn't. Not even close. I'm trying to disabuse her of that belief. Nothing more. I will not sit idly by while someone on a Democratic site tries to defend the Republican nominee.


"The true measure of a man is how he treats someone who can do him absolutely no good." Samuel Johnson
by MS01 Indie on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 04:45:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCaskill: Iraq withdrawal ti (none / 0)

" lori seems to think McCain2008 is the same as McCain2000. He isn't. Not even close. I'm trying to disabuse her of that belief. Nothing more. "

- Thats funny  .

I should probably remember to send you a thank you card after the therapy session.


Educated in a small town Taught to fear Jesus in a small town Used to daydream in that small town Another born romantic that's me.
by lori on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 04:51:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCaskill: Iraq withdrawal ti (none / 0)

Do you deny you have come to McCain's support in more than one comment thread? Do you deny you have said, in essence, McCain is a good man and will make a good president? Do you deny that you have tried to mitigate criticism of McCain?


"The true measure of a man is how he treats someone who can do him absolutely no good." Samuel Johnson
by MS01 Indie on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 04:58:15 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCaskill: Iraq withdrawal ti (none / 0)

Lori, give me a break.  McCain flip flops like crazy, its impossible to pin him down on almost any issue.

http://www.thecarpetbaggerreport.com/arc hives/15924.html


John McCain: Healthcare for Kids? In America? No way
by bosdcla14 on Fri Jul 04, 2008 at 04:27:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCaskill: Iraq withdrawal ti (none / 0)

Yeah, because things are so freaking rosy in Iraq now.  Granted, most of those dead bodies are just brown furners, but that's still an awful lot of 'em.


by username on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 04:42:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCaskill: Iraq withdrawal ti (none / 0)

The pendulum on Iraq has already swung toward McCain. Last poll I saw had the candidates split among those who consider Iraq their top issue.

Face it, the surge has not worked in the Democrats' favor politically.


The American people; they were for the war before they were against it.
by nrafter530 on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 07:42:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCaskill (2.00 / 1)

To some people, Obama's position on Iraq was one of the main reasons they supported him.  I think this will hurt him with some people if he changes his tune.

Frankly I never believed that he was going to get everyone out in 16 months so I don't care.  He is a politician and he said what he had to say about the "hot" issue of the moment.


by JustJennifer on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 04:14:45 PM EST

Re: this is a surprise to you? ??? (2.00 / 2)

Here's what I think:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25519279/

Democrat Barack Obama opened the door Thursday to altering his plan to bring U.S. troops home from Iraq in 16 months based on what he hears from military commanders during his upcoming trip there.

versus:

http://obama.senate.gov/news/051123-obam a_pull_gis/

Obama, a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said he did not back an immediate withdrawal of troops from Iraq, but he joined other Democrats in calling for a phased pullout. He declined to set a firm deadline but said a significant portion of the 160,000 U.S. troops should be home by the end of next year.

But I do not believe that setting a date certain for the total withdrawal of U.S. troops is the best approach to achieving, in a methodical and responsible way, the three basic goals that should drive our Iraq policy: that is, 1) stabilizing Iraq and giving the factions within Iraq the space they need to forge a political settlement; 2) containing and ultimately defeating the insurgency in Iraq; and 3) bringing our troops safely home.

And...

http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la- na-debate1feb01,0,848568.story

"I will be the Democrat who will be most effective in going up against a John McCain -- or any other Republican, because they all want basically a continuation of George Bush's policies -- because I will offer a clear contrast as somebody who never supported this war, thought it was a bad idea,"

Later, he said of the upcoming fight with the eventual Republican nominee, "That is an argument that I think we are going to have an easier time making if they can't turn around and say, 'But hold on a second, you supported this.' "

And then you have this...

"It will be important, however, that I will be able to present both a reasoned argument against continuing our presence in Iraq and the necessary credentials and gravitas for commander-in-chief,"... "That has to cross that threshold in the mind of every American voter."

--Hillary Clinton

So here we go again...you were against it before you were for it.

Same as it ever was.


He that lives upon hope, will die fasting. -Ben Franklin
by TxDem08 on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 04:15:25 PM EST

So will he try to (none / 0)

turn the argument back to why we got into the Iraq war in the first place?  That may be what he is trying to do.

Iraq hasn't been the #1 issue among Americans for the last six months; that things are improving may actually help him because that healthcare issue may creep above Iraq as the #2 issue.


by Blazers Edge on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 04:20:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Exactly. Does Obama stand for anything? (2.00 / 1)

Troop Withdrawal from Iraq
NAFTA
FISA
Guns
Campaign Finance
Tax Increases (may have to be deferred)....
Faith Based Organizations

To those who say, "we have to focus on winning": at this point, what exactly are you trying to win????
(Other than advancing Barack's political career?)


by BJJ Fighter on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 05:04:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]

McCaskill: Iraq withdrawal timetable (none / 0)

This is nothing new. Samantha Power said the same exact thing. And as David Axelrod said the other day on CNN, the withdrawal bill Obama sponsored in the senate was contingent on events on the ground and advice of commanders. Sorry, anyone surprised by this hasn't been paying attention.


by Todd Beeton on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 04:26:47 PM EST

Really?? (2.00 / 1)

then what is this doing on Obama's website?

Barack Obama's Plan
Judgment You Can Trust

As a candidate for the United States Senate in 2002, Obama put his political career on the line to oppose going to war in Iraq, and warned of "an occupation of undetermined length, with undetermined costs, and undetermined consequences." Obama has been a consistent, principled and vocal opponent of the war in Iraq.

   * In 2003 and 2004, he spoke out against the war on the campaign trail;
    * In 2005, he called for a phased withdrawal of our troops;
    * In 2006, he called for a timetable to remove our troops, a political solution within Iraq, and aggressive diplomacy with all of Iraq's neighbors;
    * In January 2007, he introduced legislation in the Senate to remove all of our combat troops from Iraq by March 2008.
    * In September 2007, he laid out a detailed plan for how he will end the war as president.

Bringing Our Troops Home

Obama will immediately begin to remove our troops from Iraq. He will remove one to two combat brigades each month, and have all of our combat brigades out of Iraq within 16 months. Obama will make it clear that we will not build any permanent bases in Iraq. He will keep some troops in Iraq to protect our embassy and diplomats; if al Qaeda attempts to build a base within Iraq, he will keep troops in Iraq or elsewhere in the region to carry out targeted strikes on al Qaeda.


by tarheel74 on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 05:46:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCaskill: Iraq withdrawal timetable (none / 0)

followup he now does say that he does not intend to deviate from the 16 month withdrawal timetable but his discussion will decide the residual troops in Iraq. I fear this is just another way of saying that he is wiling to keep up to 80000 troops in Iraq based on Colin Kahl's white paper for the New American Way.


by tarheel74 on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 05:55:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: McCaskill: Iraq withdrawal timetable (none / 0)

1) Obama has always said 16 months not 12 months

2) He has always said the speed maybe faster or slower depending on conditions on the ground at the time he takes office.

3) He has always said their maybe a residual force left in country to continued training of Iraqi  forces and for support. Combat brigades would be out.


Faced with the choice between changing one's mind and proving that there is no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof.
by jsfox on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 04:27:41 PM EST

We'll have to wait and see (none / 0)

what he says when comes back from Iraq; my guess is that he won't flip and is trying to insulate himself from the charge that what he is proposing is reckless.  I predict that he'll make an argument that "we are the ones who dicate conditions."  Then again, we all thought he was going to filibuster FISA.  Maybe I'm wrong and he'll try to turn the argument back to why we entered the war in the first place.


by Blazers Edge on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 04:33:27 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Good point (none / 0)

Obama wants the end the war but he has to appear that he is listening to commanders on the ground.

We have got to be realistic about this folks.


by puma on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 04:36:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Good point (none / 0)

I'm sure you'd have been saying this if Clinton had said this ten weeks ago.


by ottovbvs on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 09:24:39 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Exactly (none / 0)

I think that Obama has to check out what's on the ground and devise a plan that works to get our troops out safely.

If he just removes them willy nilly and Iraq BLOWS up than that would be a catastrophe.

Obama will do what ever he can to end the war.


by puma on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 04:35:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]

This is being misreported (none / 0)

http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsm emo.com/2008/07/news_orgs_already_gettin g_it_w.php#comments

He is also going to address reporters again to make sure they get it right


by verbatim on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 05:03:28 PM EST

Re: This is being misreported (none / 0)

""I think what's happened is the McCain campaign primed the pump with the press to suggest that somehow we had changed our policy when we hadn't, and that just hasn't been the case. I've given no indication of a change in policy."

"I intend to end this war... That position has not changed. I have not equivocated on that position. I am not searching for maneuvering room with respect to that position."" - Obama


by verbatim on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 05:08:42 PM EST
[ Parent ]

the sad truth is (2.00 / 1)

right now it is John McCain who is setting the agenda and Obama is reacting to that.


by tarheel74 on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 05:48:08 PM EST

Re: McCaskill: Iraq withdrawal timetable (2.00 / 2)

Obama looked like a complete idiot today. McCain, remember him he's the guy Obama is going to run rings around, made him look like an amateur. Almost a month after narrowly winning the nomination Obama is about 6% ahead despite the fact that Bush's approval rating is around 28% and 80% think the country is going in the wrong direction. It's no problem say the Obamanauts. Are the wheels coming off the Obama bus?  


by ottovbvs on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 07:07:59 PM EST

Re: McCaskill: Iraq withdrawal timetable (none / 0)

McCain is a hell of a lot more popular than Bush. That pretty much explains it.

and 6% popular vote win in a Presidential election is an Electoral College landslide.


The American people; they were for the war before they were against it.
by nrafter530 on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 07:45:30 PM EST
[ Parent ]

I cannot stand McCaskill (2.00 / 1)

She for no good reason supports Obama. She had the nerve, being a complete noob in the Senate, to go support someone who had been on the scene for less than half the time as Hillary Clinton. Also, in that first commercial, what the fuck did she actually mean when she was like "he'll bring a different kind of politics?" I want to know what is so different about what Obama is bringing. I cannot stand McCaskill.


by Lakrosse on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 10:43:06 PM EST

Re: I cannot stand McCaskill (none / 0)

I know!  The nerve of people who don't agree with you or support the most experienced Senator running for President...well, aside from Biden.  And Dodd.  After them.  :)


John McCain: Healthcare for Kids? In America? No way
by bosdcla14 on Fri Jul 04, 2008 at 04:26:02 AM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.